Minolta DiMAGE Xt Review
Review by Nick Burka
- Product:
- Minolta DiMAGE Xt Digital Camera (company site)
- What's Good:
- Amazing industrial design, very fast, good interface.
- What's Bad:
- Lousy default settings, hard to keep in focus even in medium light.
This is my third digital camera, and I've reviewed my Kodak DC3800 here before. I've recently departed on an eight month trip to Paris, and I decided that before this trip I needed to upgrade my camera to get better photos. Most of my fellow slices own digital cameras, and after some deliberation over prices and features, I decided on the same Minolta DiMAGE Xt my brother owns.
The real selling point of this camera (at least to me) was its incredible industrial design. The size of the DiMAGE is not the absolute smallest camera, but it is quite slim and easily and comfortably fits into your pocket making it easy to whip out. Despite its small size, the camera is still very easy to hold firmly in your hand with the aid of the little silver tab on the side which helps you grip it. The most eye-opening design feature of the camera is its telescoping zoom lens. Using angled mirrors that slide up and down within the body of the camera, the 3x optical zoom lens doesn't protrude outside the camera; very slick. One shortcoming of the design is the viewfinder which is almost useless because of the distortion of what you can see; though you'll usually find yourself using the screen anyway.
The user-interface of the camera is also very good. First of all, it's very fast. Switching menus and flipping between photos never stops for loading times. The menus and buttons are also quite intuitive. You can program the left-right buttons during photo taking to custom control white-balance or contrast, delete photos immediately without having to play with menus, and control the camera's settings all very quickly. Quickly reviewing images right after you take them and referencing your photo settings are all done with easy-to-read fonts and well designed hierarchal menus.
The main downside of these menu items is how the default settings are configured. My first few outings with the camera were frustrating because the default settings were so badly set. For example: by default filenames aren't unique, so every outing with the camera uses the same filenames - forcing you to save photos in different directories to keep them from overwriting each other. This can be changed deep within the settings menu, but I can't be in the minority - most people must save batches of photos together. There were several other settings like this.
I've been pretty impressed by the photo quality of the DiMAGE so far - but, I think there are other cameras that are better. In low-light if the camera is properly setup, or in brighter conditions, the DiMAGE can produce some stunning results. On the other hand, if you don't take time to setup a shot, the result is usually blurry or not properly lit. If you're looking for a camera that can produce stunning quick point-and-shoot photos, I'd actually recommend the Canon Power-Shot Series of cameras which several of my friends own.
The real selling points of this camera are its relatively small size and beautiful design. Picture quality is about average and the price is quite reasonable. For a more thorough technical review of the camera, see: DC Resource.
Comments
dimageman - April 25, 2005 4:24 pm
okay man
Pat Leblanc - August 1, 2005 12:01 pm
Hi,
We also enjoy our Minolta Dimage XT, but there is a very annoying problem: the pictures, when viewed directly on TV via the USB cable, are always bright enough and acceptable.
But when I transfer them on my hard disk, I get very dark pictures, and I have to fiddle a lot with a picture editing software to correct the colour levels abd brightness.
Do you have an idea to fix that problem?